IQ Insight | September 2005


ROI of Recruiters

By Bruce Powell

Business leaders don't think twice about engaging an outside expert for legal advice or accounting assistance - but many of these same corporate managers will balk at the cost of engaging an outside recruiter to help them resolve their hiring needs.

I understand. As a client I used to feel the same way about using headhunters. "They're so expensive," I thought. "I can manage the process myself for much less." Unfortunately, I didn't understand the true cost of managing my own hiring or the value that a really good recruitment partner could actually provide.

Bad News - only 1/3 of all hires are effective.

It's not uncommon for businesses to make a bad hire. In most cases, their batting average is no better than .333, where only one-third of all hiring decisions are deemed successful; one-third are minimally effective; and one-third are outright failures. And the cost of all these mis-hires goes far beyond the cost of their salary. Unfortunately, when you add up the numbers, the cost of mis-hiring is often a company's biggest and most poorly managed expense. And in no other area of business would management accept such mediocre performance on a regular basis.

The cheap person pays twice.

What happens if you hire the wrong person for the job? And what happens when it takes a long time for you to fill an empty seat? Unfortunately, the poorly staffed and under-resourced companies usually end up over-burdening their existing staff - which in turn leads to increased frustration and departure levels among their more qualified employees. It's a vicious cycle.

Excessive employee turnover will cripple your business, killing it softly as the hard and soft costs of hiring rarely get factored into year-end budgets or financial reports. And other soft costs, such as on-boarding, training and development, and employee management become excessively expensive if the processes must be constantly repeated as a result of poor hiring decisions.

Consider this:

  • On average employee turnover costs a company 150 per cent of a churned employee's annual compensation.
  • This means an employee making $50,000 per year will cost your company at least $75,000 to replace.
  • If an average-sized company with 1,000 employees has annual turnover of 10 per cent, its annual cost of turnover would be $7.5 million!
  • In addition, for every week a position is empty (or improperly filled), the additional cost of lost productivity is 50 per cent of the position's weekly compensation and benefits - over and above the cost of replacement!

Worse still, these numbers don't fully account for the organizational costs of managing the hiring process. A typical search for a new mid-management employee (i.e. the screening 100's of unqualified resumes and dozens of wasted interviews) takes between 150 and 200 people hours (up to 5 weeks!) to execute. Companies can't afford to re-allocate that many resources these days. And most of our clients balk at the added workload of trying to manage this process themselves!

So what happens? Sadly, most companies settle for mediocrity and don't invest the time, energy or money to hire right. They lack commitment to their hiring process, have undisciplined hiring criteria, and ultimately make mediocre hires - which exacerbates the problem and increases employee turnover. The kicker is that this increased employee turnover diminishes the firm's reputation and makes it more difficult to recruit the top performers! Again, it's a vicious cycle that directly impacts the bottom line.

"Ok," you say, "So it costs me to make poor hires - what's the real impact?"

Let me give you an example: One of our clients with 150 employees recently confided they have an annual turnover rate of over 30 per cent - more than double the industry average! They knew this was costing them but they didn't realize how much. Using our estimates above (and these are conservative - some experts put the cost of replacing a mid-management employee as high as 10 times their annual salary!), and an average compensation of $70k, this turnover costs our client almost $5,000,000 year!

Sure, many of the costs are intangible and hard to finger - but whatever your calculation methodology, these problems cause a very real drain to profitability. In this client's case, by simply reducing their turnover to only 20 per cent (still higher than average) they would save over $2,000,000 annually in lost productivity and turnover costs. A huge boost to the bottom-line!

So how do you fix this?

Unfortunately, there's no refund for the time, money and resources your company pour into poor personnel decisions. But there are ways to improve your odds of success.

By making a commitment to the hiring process, developing disciplined hiring criteria, engaging in 3rd-party and objective candidate assessment, and pro-actively refreshing and recruiting new talent, you will automatically improve your hiring performance.

And by leveraging the expertise, commitment, and partnership of a skilled external recruiter you will radically improve your results and your bottom-line!

"What?!" you exclaim, "How can incurring an expense improve my bottom-line?"

Believe it or not, working with a good recruiter is usually the most cost-effective way to hire better. Good recruiters bring professional process, industry insight, and an objective perspective to the hiring table. Process and a wider recruitment net guarantee you better hiring results. And the counsel they can offer you about the market and strategies to retain your existing employees can be invaluable.

Because they interview thousands of people every year, recruiters are also skilled specialists when it comes to identifying, qualifying and assessing top performers. They can tell you who's good, who's not - and why! And because they have their fingers on the pulse of the market, good recruiting partners can often identify the exceptional talent ahead of your hiring need! (i.e. minimizes corporate downtime)

More importantly, recruiters engage in direct contact head-hunting. They'll work with you to develop a clear and compelling opportunity profile - and then they'll work the phones and go after the exceptional "passive candidates" you really want to hire. Unlike an internal HR manager who often has other responsibilities on top of hiring, recruiters actively recruit people who aren't necessarily looking for a job. And their external objectivity and career-management counsel can give them an advantage when approaching a target candidate.

This is an absolutely critical step to secure top talent - and something few companies have the resources or experience to do themselves. Ultimately it leads to better hiring.

A good recruiter will:

  • Assist with definition of the position criteria
  • Provide guidance on your org structure and compensation standards
  • Identify and recruit passive candidates (who wouldn't have replied to an ad)
  • Qualify, assess and evaluate recruited candidates against the position's specifications and their fit with the company's corporate culture
  • Check references and assist in negotiating (and closing) an offer
  • Offer hiring counsel above and beyond your expectations

But what about the cost?

At first blush, recruiters can appear expensive, often charging a flat-rate or percentage fee between 20 and 30 per cent of a new hire's annual base salary. But when you compare this to the opportunity, turnover and additional soft costs of a mis-hire - the value is much more obvious.

Businesses worried about recruiter costs usually don't calculate the intangible cost of hiring poorly. Take for example our client noted above - over the next year they will need to hire 45 new employees. If they use a recruiter for all these hires (average fee of $15k/hire) the cost to the company would be almost $700,000. At first glance, this appears to be an astronomical sum. But if professional recruiting processes generate better hires, and better hires reduce their churn by 1/3 - the company will save over $1,000,000 in reduced employee turnover costs the following year! Aha! - A much better value proposition.

Of course there's no guarantee. You need to work with recruiters who understand the importance of identifying A-level talent, recruiters who are experts in their fields and committed to their craft to get the best results. And even then you will make the occasional mistake - BUT your odds of a mis-hire are far reduced. And the cumulative and eroding effect of B-level hires is diminished.

The bottom line.

Sure, you could probably do your own accounting, but you still hire accountants because they ensure everything is done right and you get the best results. Working with a trusted recruiting partner does the same thing to your hiring process.

The calculations represented here can be manipulated in several more complicated data models - but the end result is usually the same. Developing a trusted and ongoing relationship with a good recruiting partner can save your company money.

When it comes to hiring people, better results means smarter, more engaged, and more productive hires. And better hires lead to a more profitable business. Isn't that what it's all about?


IQ Insight is published by IQ PARTNERS Inc.

IQ PARTNERS helps intelligent companies hire better, hire less and retain more. Our services include Executive Search, Qualification & Assessment, Employee Development & Retention, Career Management, and Contract HR Services. We specialize in Marketing, Communications, Media, Technology and Financial Services, and operate at the mid-to-senior management level. IQ PARTNERS has offices in Toronto and Ottawa, and internationally via the Aravati Global Search Network.

Privacy Policy
© September 2005 IQ PARTNERS Inc. All rights reserved.